Uber has spent a decade insisting it doesn't own the cars. This week it took an equity position in the company that sells the bikes.
The ride-hailing firm is putting money into Galgo, the Santiago-based platform that sells and finances motorcycles to Latin American buyers who can't get bank credit. Per the companies' joint announcement out of Mexico City, the tie-up launches in Mexico, reaches Chile and Colombia in the first quarter of 2027, and funds Galgo's push into an unnamed fourth market plus spending on technology, data and AI. Terms weren't disclosed. Federico Chester, Uber's head of Latin America business development, described Galgo as a lender that can scale to people the traditional system leaves out.
That's the press release. Here's the part that actually matters if you care about two-wheelers.
In North America a motorcycle is a toy. In Colombia it's the vehicle fleet. The country's national traffic registry reported that motorcycles made up 63% of registrations active in the system at the end of 2025 — 13,528,164 of them, against 7,585,011 cars and trucks combined. The year before, the same registry counted 816,513 new motorcycles registered in a single year.
How F1 Teams Make Money: A Deep Dive Into Formula 1's Business Model
Prada's Scrapped Rolls-Royce Corniche Program Lands It a $5 Million Lawsuit
That's the demand curve Uber is buying into. A 125cc commuter costs a fraction of a used car, sips fuel, filters through gridlock that would kill a delivery window, and can be financed over 24 to 36 months at a payment a courier can hit. The constraint has never been demand. It's been that the guy who needs the bike to earn income can't prove income to get the bike.
This is the genuinely interesting engineering problem, and it's legal rather than mechanical.
Mexico, where the product launches first, has no statutory ceiling on consumer interest rates. The Supreme Court has instead held that judges may find a rate usurious and reduce it — case by case, on their own initiative, using the disclosed total annual cost as the reference point. That's a very different risk profile than a hard cap: enormous pricing latitude going in, and litigation exposure that only crystallizes years later, one contract at a time.
Colombia does the opposite. The financial regulator certifies monthly an "interés bancario corriente" for each credit category, and the usury ceiling sits 1.5 times above it. Exceed it and you're not merely in regulatory trouble — you're in the criminal code. The number moves every month, which means a lender's maximum legal price on a 36-month contract is set by a resolution published weeks before signing.
Chile runs a Tasa Máxima Convencional under Ley 18.010, published as a monthly certificate by the market regulator. Galgo's operating company knows this system intimately. A CMF resolution records that Liquitech SpA — the entity behind the Galgo brand — self-reported having exceeded the TMC on a batch of 2021 loans, and the regulator issued a censure in April 2023, a fact later cited in the CMF's own sanctions register.
The mechanism there is worth understanding because it recurs across the region: the dispute wasn't about a headline rate. It was about whether certain charges counted as fees or as interest. Reclassify a "processing charge" as interest and a compliant loan becomes an illegal one without a single number on the contract changing. Any rider signing one of these should ask for the all-in annualized cost, not the monthly payment.
Here's the thing lenders in this segment quietly live with. That same Colombian registry found that at the close of 2025, 9,896,601 vehicles were running with expired mandatory SOAT insurance — 47% of the fleet — and that motorcycles were the class with the worst compliance. Technical inspection was worse still, with 10,036,753 vehicles lacking a current certificate.
Translate that into the loan file. A financed motorcycle is the security for the debt. If roughly half of the bikes on the road are uninsured, then a meaningful share of collateral can be written off in a single intersection with nothing to claim against — and the borrower still owes the balance. The bike is gone, the income stream is gone, the debt isn't.
Practical takeaway for anyone taking one of these deals: confirm whether the financing bundles mandatory insurance into the payment, and whether it includes theft cover or only third-party liability. Those are not the same product, and motorcycle theft is precisely the risk that turns a manageable payment into an unpayable one.
Delivery duty is brutal on a small-displacement bike. A courier running 150 to 250 km a day in city traffic will burn through chain and sprockets, rear tires, brake pads and fork oil at several times the pace of a weekend commuter. Budget consumables as a monthly line item, not an annual surprise — because a chain that snaps under load can take the case with it, and a rider with no reserve is a rider who skips the service.
Land Rover's Putting A Dakar Race Truck, A Rare '90s Defender, And A Mystery Reveal On The Same Lawn At The Quail
2027 Kawasaki ZX-6R Returns Unchanged — And That's the Story
Then look at the term. If the loan runs 36 months and the bike's realistic working life under that duty cycle is closer to two years, the last twelve payments are on an asset that's already worn out. That gap is where financed gig work goes wrong, and it has nothing to do with the interest rate.
Notably, nobody has said how the loans will be underwritten. The obvious innovation — using verified platform earnings as income data, and collecting repayment from those earnings — would be a real improvement over guessing at a cash-economy borrower's capacity. It would also mean a rider's debt service and their access to work sit with the same counterparty. That's a structure worth watching closely rather than cheering.
Worth noting too: Mexico's national statistics agency excludes motorcycles from its monthly vehicle registration series. There is no official public tally of how many bikes the country actually sells. Uber is writing credit into a market whose size nobody outside the industry can independently verify — a category of bet Uber itself files under new ventures being inherently risky in its own annual report.
The motorcycles will sell either way. The question is what the paperwork costs.