Evidence about Karmelo Anthony's alleged history with knives and violence was kept from the jury that convicted him of murder, prosecutors said Thursday as they fought his push for another trial.
The allegations surfaced during Anthony's new-trial hearing, where lead prosecutor Bill Wirske said Anthony's former girlfriend went to his school on the morning of the stabbing and reported that she was afraid of him.
Wirske also said the state had text messages and other material it contends showed Anthony's interest in violence and knives. None of that material was presented to jurors during Anthony's murder trial.
Texas Judge Who Presided Over Karmelo Anthony Murder Trial Removed From Case Over 'Got It Right' Comment
The prosecutor said Anthony's original defense team entered a verbal agreement with the state to keep character evidence involving Anthony, Austin Metcalf and Austin's brother, Hunter Metcalf, out of the trial.
Anthony's new legal team disputes that account, arguing prosecutors did not honor the agreement and that the dispute affected Anthony's decision whether to testify.
Anthony's attorneys argued that jurors never heard material they say could have supported his self-defense claim. They pointed to school records, social-media posts and videos alleging prior aggressive behavior by Austin Metcalf and his twin brother.
The defense cited alleged racist language, prior fights and disciplinary incidents, arguing Anthony knew the brothers could be aggressive.
The material was not presented to the original jury, and the court has not made findings on the allegations.
Retired District Judge Michael Chitty is hearing Anthony's motion for a new trial Thursday, after Judge Sid Harle removed Judge John Roach from Anthony's remaining trial-court proceedings Wednesday.
Harle found that a reasonable outside observer could question whether Roach appeared impartial after Roach said in a post-trial television interview that the jury "got it right" and defended several of his trial decisions.
Karmelo Anthony Isolated In Jail As Track Meet Killer Appeals Conviction, Preps For Prison Stint
Roach's removal is a significant win for Anthony's new legal team, but it does not erase his conviction or sentence. The far more consequential question is whether Chitty will grant Anthony a new trial.
Metcalf's father, Jeff Metcalf, said Roach's removal did not change his view of the case because it did not alter the evidence that led to Anthony's conviction.
"It's just one step in a long journey," Metcalf said Wednesday on "The Will Cain Show." "It doesn't really change the facts."
Anthony, 19, was convicted in June of murdering 17-year-old Metcalf, who he fatally stabbed during an altercation at a Frisco track meet. A Collin County jury sentenced Anthony to 35 years in prison.
Before Thursday's hearing, an estimated 75 to 100 people gathered outside the courtroom, with some raising their fists as lead defense attorney Russell Wilson arrived. One man wore a Black Panther uniform.
Members of the Anthony and Metcalf families sat on opposite sides of the courtroom. Metcalf's father greeted Wirske before the hearing, and Anthony entered in a navy suit and tie with his wrists shackled.
Criminal appellate lawyer Brett Ordiway said motions to remove a judge are difficult and uncommon, but a motion for a new trial is a much steeper legal climb.
"Granting that motion wipes out the conviction and the sentence altogether and gives Karmelo Anthony a new trial," Ordiway told Fox News Digital. "It is very, very difficult to win these motions in any case, and I would be surprised if they were successful here."
Karmelo Anthony Blasts Judge In New Filing Over Handling Of Murder Trial
Anthony's attorneys argued Roach could not fairly consider the new-trial request because his public comments addressed the same issues they raise in their motion, including courtroom access.
Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X
The motion argues Anthony's trial was not open enough to the public. Cameras were barred from the courtroom and only 27 seats were available for members of the public.
Judge Defends Barring Cameras From Karmelo Anthony Murder Trial, Says It Was 'An Easy Decision'
The new-trial motion also challenges the jury instructions, arguing they limited jurors' ability to fully consider Anthony's claim of self-defense.
During Thursday's hearing, Wilson said the defense would present more than 40 exhibits and at least 12 witnesses. He argued that the access restrictions amounted to an unconstitutional courtroom closure and that Roach made critical decisions outside the formal court record.
Sign Up To Get The Latest True Crime News
Wirske countered that Anthony's trial lawyers consented to the security and courtroom-access decisions now challenged by the new defense team. He said the parties relied on paper filings and off-the-record discussions because of threats, doxxing and efforts to disrupt the high-profile case.
Mike Howard, Anthony's former lead attorney, testified that the lawyers and Judge John Roach held more than a dozen off-the-record meetings before trial. Howard said Anthony was not present for those discussions and that no pretrial motions were formally filed because the parties used what he described as an "old-school" system of filing materials directly with Roach.
Howard said the defense discussed waiving some public-trial access because of security concerns, but that no Sixth Amendment waiver was made on the record. He testified that the decision not to use an overflow room was tied to technology concerns, not a specific security threat.
Howard testified that the defense understood its oral agreement with the state to allow Anthony to testify, provided the testimony stayed focused on the confrontation under the tent.
But Howard said that changed on the final day of trial, when prosecutors told the defense that the agreement did not cover a testifying Anthony and argued that the defense had already opened the door to character evidence. Howard testified that the dispute led to a heated break in the proceedings and forced the defense to reconsider whether Anthony should take the stand.
Howard said Roach told the lawyers he did not see a legal way to enforce their agreement. The former defense attorney testified that the uncertainty over what prosecutors could raise on cross-examination affected Anthony's decision not to testify.
Chitty's timeline is unusually short. Anthony was sentenced June 9, and Texas rules require a judge to rule on a motion for a new trial within 75 days of sentencing. That deadline falls Monday.
Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More
"If the judge does not grant the motion by Monday, then by operation of law, the motion will be denied," Ordiway said.
If Chitty grants the motion, Anthony's existing conviction and sentence would be set aside. Ordiway said the case would effectively return to the point before Anthony was convicted and sentenced, allowing Anthony to pursue another jury trial or negotiate a plea agreement.
Convicted Killer Karmelo Anthony Claims He Is 'Penniless' In Appeal Despite Major Donor-funded Legal Campaign
If the motion is denied, Anthony's legal fight will continue on direct appeal, a process that differs sharply from the fast-moving new-trial request.
LISTEN TO THE NEW 'CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO' PODCAST
A direct appeal is decided by a three-judge panel of the Texas Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas and can take a year or longer, Ordiway said. Appeals generally focus on legal errors raised and decided in the trial court, while a motion for a new trial gives the trial court an opportunity to correct alleged errors soon after a conviction.
Anthony filed both the recusal motion and his request for a new trial on July 7. Roach referred the recusal request for assignment to another judge under Texas procedure.
Click Here To Download The Fox News App
Fox News Digital has reached out to Anthony's defense team for comment.
Fox News' Peter Cuddihy contributed to this report.
Original article source: Untapped Karmelo Anthony evidence cache showed he stalked ex-girlfriend, had 'knives' obsession: prosecutors