Last month, I stood before the Alachua County Commission and asked all five commissioners to take a closer look at the county's automated license plate reader program. I wasn't asking anyone to rip them out. I asked for guardrails: shorter retention, real audits, transparency about who can access the data, and an accounting of what it costs. All five agreed it deserved a closer look.
Then things moved faster than I expected.
On Aug. 31, the Florida Department of Transportation revoked its general use permits for license plate readers in state highway rights-of-way and gave agencies 30 days to take them down. Alachua County Sheriff Chad Scott identified 27 devices here that met the criteria. Readers outside those rights-of-way remain in service.
I spent the summer combing through public records requests about this program. One open question in my report was whether the required FDOT permits were on file. I did not expect the state to answer by revoking all of them.
So here is the honest question: why is this the line?
I don't believe the state's action proves these cameras have no legitimate purpose. They help recover stolen vehicles, find missing people and support investigations. Sheriff Scott says the technology has helped his office solve homicides, armed robberies and missing-person cases. I have no reason to doubt him.
Lake County sent me two dozen case summaries saying the same, and I published them. But concerns about how quickly this system grew don't disappear because some cameras come down while the network stays up. A right-of-way boundary is a jurisdictional line. It is not a privacy policy.
Grand Jury: Grand jury says DCF not doing its job. Sen. Don Gaetz calls for action
What strikes me most is what the Sheriff said this week, that the vast majority of vehicles these cameras photograph belong to people going to work or taking their children to school, and those people "are not suspects, and they should not be treated as such." He said the real questions are what is collected, how long it is kept, who can access it, and what makes a search legitimate.
That is close to what I asked for from the podium. If the sheriff and I agree on the questions, this county ought to answer them in public.
The technology arrived first. The public conversation is happening now, under pressure from Tallahassee. We put the consent cart before the horse.
Some people told me afterward that I should have shown up angrier. I understand the instinct. But I asked the Sheriff's Office for these records and they handed them over, free, in about a week. It is hard to stay furious at an agency that gives you the evidence. That doesn't settle the policy question. It means the argument can be about documents instead of villains.
I will speak with other ACSO representatives soon, and I intend to listen. If the answers are good, I will say so publicly.
We can support law enforcement and value investigative technology while insisting that any system capable of observing nearly everyone stays governed by rules the public helped write.
Sam Cornell lives in Gainesville and is a surgical coordinator in organ recovery and an independent researcher who has used Florida public-records requests to examine local government issues, including automated license plate reader technology, and publishes his findings for public review.
Guest columns about local, regional or statewide issues should be no longer than 500 words. Please include a photo and a one- to two-line bio about the author. You must include your name and daytime phone number so we can call to confirm authorship. Only your name and city will be published. Please send guest columns to [email protected] and write "guest column" in the subject line.
This article originally appeared on The Gainesville Sun: License plate readers need public guardrails | Sam Cornell